Egregio Professor Pelanda,
E' con rinnovata speranza che ho deciso di scriverLe per
condividere con
Lei le idee e gli spunti "politically uncorrected" che
liberi pensatori
nel mondo sentono il dovere di esprimere.
Con l'articolo che di seguito trascrivo, apparso nell'edizione di
oggi del
Washington Times, desidero iniziare con Lei un proficuo scambio di
idee
e di proposte che possano trovare una eco anche tra i visitatori
del Suo
sito.
Sperando di farLe cosa gradita, La saluto cordialmente.
Piermario Croce
Torino, Italia
-------------------------
THE BIDEN-HATCH AMENDMENT
In an amendment co-sponsored by Democratic Sen. Joe Biden Jr. and
Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch, the Senate is piggy-backing on a recent
Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) directive. Beginning Aug. 14, the SEC
will
require the chief executive officer and chief financial officer of any
company
with at least $1.2 billion in annual revenue to personally attest to,
and
assume personal liability for, the accuracy of the financial statements
their
company submit to the SEC. The Biden-Hatch amendment will make this bad
idea worse
by requiring a company's chairman of the board to also certify the
statements.
There are short-term and long-term problems with this approach. In
the
short run, it is difficult to imagine a greater incentive for
corporations to
intentionally lowball their earnings. To be on the "safe
side," that would
include legitimate earnings. The result, of course, will be
increases in
corporate price-earnings ratios, a development that could easily
encourage
a further downward-spiraling in stock prices.
In the long run, given that the False Statement Act already
requires such
submissions to be truthful, the seeming redundancy of both the SEC
and the
Senate versions appears tailor-made to appeal to one of the
Democratic
Party's most politically generous groups, the tort bar. The required
signed
statement, which, interestingly enough, the SEC had to correct shortly
after the
agency designed it, contains several weasel phrases ? "to the best
of my
knowledge" and "a material fact" ? that tort lawyers will
exploit with the fervor
they have displayed while chasing ambulances. Indeed, is there any doubt
that
tort lawyers will seek to do to America's capitalistic system ?
the
greatest creator of wealth in history ? what they have done to OB/GYN
doctors and
patients?
Now, unless a CEO or chairman is thoroughly steeped in the arcane
minutiae
of corporate accounting ? a category that would exclude Bill Gates,
Andy
Grove and other corporate titans who have generated incalculable
wealth
exploiting their entrepreneurial-engineering instincts and
backgrounds ?
the CEO and chairman will surely be hostage to their accounting
staffs.
How much entrepreneurial energy will be sacrificed as a CEO or
chairman
immerses himself in accounting complexities?
Moreover, consider the bipartisan analysis of Kevin Hassett and
Peter
Wallison of the American Enterprise Institute and Robert Shapiro,
formerly of the
Democratic Leadership Council, who warned recently that "significantly
increas[ing] the exposure of firms and particularly their managers to
litigation" will
"likely impose significant new costs on American firms with
little likely
benefit." They argue that requiring CEOs, CFOs and chairmen
to certify
that the financial statements "fairly present, in all material
respects, the
operations and financial condition of the public company"
would "expose
firms subject to changing market conditions to new liability
exposure.
When an unforeseen material event occurs," they note, "the
plaintiffs lawyers
? with the benefit of hindsight ? will be able to argue that the
previous
certification was false in its claim." Who doubts that this
is precisely
what will happen? And, as this process surely evolves, how many
highly
qualified people will be discouraged from accepting senior executive
positions? And
what price will that exact on the economy?
Finally, it is bemusing ?at the least ? that Congress, which
refuses to
honestly address, or even acknowledge, the trillions of dollars of
unfunded liabilities in the so-called trust funds for Social Security
and Medicare,
assumes it is capable of devising complex, efficient solutions
enabling
corporations to honestly address business problems about which so
many in
Congress know so little.
|