| Egregio Professor Pelanda,
 E' con rinnovata speranza che ho deciso di scriverLe per
        condividere con
 Lei le idee e gli spunti "politically uncorrected" che
        liberi pensatori
 nel mondo sentono il dovere di esprimere.
 
 Con l'articolo che di seguito trascrivo, apparso nell'edizione di
        oggi del
 Washington Times, desidero iniziare con Lei un proficuo scambio di
        idee
 e di proposte che possano trovare una eco anche tra i visitatori
        del Suo
 sito.
 
 Sperando di farLe cosa gradita, La saluto cordialmente.
 
 Piermario Croce
 Torino, Italia
 
 -------------------------
 THE BIDEN-HATCH AMENDMENT
 
 In an amendment co-sponsored by Democratic Sen. Joe Biden Jr. and
 Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch, the Senate is piggy-backing on a recent
        Securities and
 Exchange Commission (SEC) directive. Beginning Aug. 14, the SEC
        will
 require the chief executive officer and chief financial officer of any
        company
 with at least $1.2 billion in annual revenue to personally attest to,
        and
 assume personal liability for, the accuracy of the financial statements
        their
 company submit to the SEC. The Biden-Hatch amendment will make this bad
        idea worse
 by requiring a company's chairman of the board to also certify the
 statements.
 
 There are short-term and long-term problems with this approach. In
        the
 short run, it is difficult to imagine a greater incentive for
        corporations to
 intentionally lowball their earnings. To be on the "safe
        side," that would
 include legitimate earnings. The result, of course, will be
        increases in
 corporate price-earnings ratios, a development that could easily
        encourage
 a further downward-spiraling in stock prices.
 In the long run, given that the False Statement Act already
        requires such
 submissions to be truthful, the seeming redundancy of both the SEC
        and the
 
 Senate versions appears tailor-made to appeal to one of the
        Democratic
 Party's most politically generous groups, the tort bar. The required
        signed
 statement, which, interestingly enough, the SEC had to correct shortly
        after the
 agency designed it, contains several weasel phrases ? "to the best
        of my
 knowledge" and "a material fact" ? that tort lawyers will
        exploit with the fervor
 they have displayed while chasing ambulances. Indeed, is there any doubt
        that
 tort lawyers will seek to do to America's capitalistic system ?
        the
 greatest creator of wealth in history ? what they have done to OB/GYN
        doctors and
 patients?
 Now, unless a CEO or chairman is thoroughly steeped in the arcane
        minutiae
 of corporate accounting ? a category that would exclude Bill Gates,
        Andy
 Grove and other corporate titans who have generated incalculable
        wealth
 exploiting their entrepreneurial-engineering instincts and
        backgrounds ?
 the CEO and chairman will surely be hostage to their accounting
        staffs.
 How much entrepreneurial energy will be sacrificed as a CEO or
        chairman
 immerses himself in accounting complexities?
 Moreover, consider the bipartisan analysis of Kevin Hassett and
        Peter
 Wallison of the American Enterprise Institute and Robert Shapiro,
        formerly of the
 Democratic Leadership Council, who warned recently that "significantly
 increas[ing] the exposure of firms and particularly their managers to
        litigation" will
 "likely impose significant new costs on American firms with
        little likely
 benefit." They argue that requiring CEOs, CFOs and chairmen
        to certify
 that the financial statements "fairly present, in all material
        respects, the
 operations and financial condition of the public company"
        would "expose
 firms subject to changing market conditions to new liability
        exposure.
 When an unforeseen material event occurs," they note, "the
        plaintiffs lawyers
 ? with the benefit of hindsight ? will be able to argue that the
        previous
 certification was false in its claim." Who doubts that this
        is precisely
 what will happen? And, as this process surely evolves, how many
        highly
 qualified people will be discouraged from accepting senior executive
        positions? And
 what price will that exact on the economy?
 Finally, it is bemusing ?at the least ? that Congress, which
        refuses to
 honestly address, or even acknowledge, the trillions of dollars of
 unfunded liabilities in the so-called trust funds for Social Security
        and Medicare,
 assumes it is capable of devising complex, efficient solutions
        enabling
 corporations to honestly address business problems about which so
        many in
 Congress know so little.
 
 |